Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5905 13
Original file (NR5905 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE RUAD, SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

JET
Docket No. NR5905-13
22 Nov 13

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 uSC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinions furnished by HQMC Memo 7220 MPO dtd 27 Jun 13
and Email dtd 22 Aug 13, copies of which is attached.

The Post-9/11 Veterans Education Assistance Act (Post-9/11 GI
Bill, Public Law 110-252) was signed into law on 30 June 2008

‘ and became effective on 1 August 2009, General descriptions of

the essential components of the new law were widely available
beginning in summer 2008 and specific implementing guidance was
published in the summer of 2009. Under the governing
regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must
be on active duty or in the selected reserve at the time of the
election to transfer. This is an important feature of the law
because the transferability provisions are intended as an
incentive vice a benefit. Members who are retired are not
eligible to transfer such benefits.

Evidence shows that you Failed to take the steps necessary to
transfer benefits while in the required status. You claim that
in August 2009 while you were still on active duty, you
transferred your Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to your dependents.
Docket No. NR5305-13

However, there is no evidence to corroborate your claim. The
only evidence of you entering the Transfer of Education Benefits
(TEB) website is a print out from the TEB web application
showing you entered website on May 1, 2013 in an attempt to
transfer the benefits to your dependents. No other evidence
exists that shows your claim that you entered the TEB website
rior to May 1, 2013 and transferred/attempted to transfer your
Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.
+

In your current status as an Individual Ready Reservist, you are
not eligible to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to your
dependents. In order to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits,
members must be in an active duty or selective reserve status.
You will, however, qualify to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill
benefits to your dependents once you complete a qualifying
period of active duty.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

. N
Seidel

Executive Director

Enclosure: 1. HOMC Memo 7220 MPO dtd 27 Jun 13
2. Email dtd 22 Aug 13

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1068 14

    Original file (NR1068 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 4920 MPO of 29 May 14, copy of which 4s attached and was previously sent you, to which you failed to respond. However, the DoD 1341.13 specifically states that ‘an individual may not add family members after retirement or separation from Military Services, uscG, NOAA Corps, or PHS, but may modify the number of months of transferred entitlement or revoke transfer of entitlement after retirement or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3895 14

    Original file (NR3895 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7220 MPO of 22 Sep 14, a copy of which is attached. Accordingly, your application has been denied. NR3895-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2358 14

    Original file (NR2358 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application fo naval record A three-member panel of the Board e session, mber 2014. accordance with administrative Records, sitting in executiv application on 30 Septe injustice were reviewed in regulations and procedures appl Board. ‘3.E, Members may check TES periodically for status of their application.” There is no evidence that you entered the TEB website to transfer your benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3219 14

    Original file (NR3219 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 7220 MPO of 18 Jul 14, 4 copy of which is attached. Members who are retired ar the benefits. Your application claims, that “I was erroneously denied the ability to convey pest 211 educational penefits Lu my children.” You sise claim that “At sometime between April and June 2010, I made the attempt to transfer my educational benefits to my two oldest children...I was told by the Staff Non-Commissioned Officer in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR876 14

    Original file (NR876 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Because of a civil court case Secretary of the Navy was directed to reconsider his decision made in the Records (BCNR) to consider your case regarding your forced retirement per the FY09 Colonel SRB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3753 14

    Original file (NR3753 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5167 14

    Original file (NR5167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was medically separated with 100% service connected disability.” You further claim that “I attended Tap and Tamps in Camp Pendleton and was told that I could transfer my benefits anytime I wanted even after leaving the armed forces.” The Board found you have provided no proof to back up your claim that you were given misleading information on when you could transfer your ‘benefits. considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1676-13

    Original file (NR1676-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Information was published in NAVADMINS 187/09 & 203/09 detailing the actions members were required to take to transfer their benefits to their dependents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8068 14

    Original file (NR8068 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board has determined, -however, that regardless of who was with you when you claim to have :made the transfer of benefits, there is no evidence of you having ever “transferred your Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to your dependents. Furthermore, the Board found that even there was evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958

    Original file (AR20140020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...